Iwonder if back as a child, Mr. Lars Ulrich from Metallica used to tape his favorite songs off the radio and share tapes with his friends? I sit here and wonder how many of these so-called music stars used to do just the same? How many of them would be using Napster today if they were not music? Things that make you go hmmm....I used to love that song; maybe I'll just log onto Napster and download it.

     But wait, if Mr. Ulrich of Metallicathat greedy, money-grubbing band that I do love-but can't stand at that moment, gets his way, Napster will be no longer around and people like me will have to search in discount bins and crappy record stores to find that song we loved so much as kids.

     Napster is a FREE Internet service that allows everyone a chance to download music for free. You can share files with your Internet companions and listen to your hearts' content. Musical hits (great songs in my opinion) that can be downloaded include classics such as Mr. Roboto by Styx, and soon to be a classic It Sucks to be You by Prozzak. Over twenty million users are finding it easy to locate these songs and share them with one another.

     The music industry has a major problem with this, claiming copyright infringement and theft of their music. My colleague, Jennifer J. in her Napster Commentary loves the site but will use legal mumbo jumbo to actually agree with the record industry. And believes Napster may be shut down.

     I do not care much for legal crap, because at most time it is set up to keep little guys from moving up in the world. In this case, Napster is being held back in an attempt to keep them from making money, in an attempt to keep us from listening to good music and in an attempt to have us dish out up to twenty dollars for a CD, or listen to the same songs over and over again as stations play a song every hour on the hour.

     I am the common man. A man of the people. I write for the masses, not for some stuffy lawyer type charging a thousand an hour, claiming he/she is just trying to feed their family. So my views, hopefully, are your views. Let's see...

     View 1: I want special songs. I want hard to find songs. I don't want full albums. If I want Mr. Roboto, I don't want to buy the whole Styx album. Mr. Roboto, in my opinion, was the only good song. Why do some musicians make a song for an album (for example Christina Aguilera), and when they release it for radio, it is re-recorded and sound different. I should buy an album for a song that sounds bad when there is a better version out there that can be downloaded off the net? What about special concert versions and mixes? Where can I get them without being incredibly hooked up? Napster helps me get these songs. That's all I care about.

     View 2: Yeah, people have downloaded the Limp Bizkit Mission Impossible 2 (MI:2) song. Limp Bizkit doesn't care. They support Napster. Record executives do care. They want me to buy the whole CD. No way. A colleague I work with on my alma mater's paper, received the MI: 2 CD and said it sucked. Only Metallica and Limp Bizkit's songs were worth buying and often times, record companies won't release a single to the public, forcing us to shell out boku bucks for utter crap. And if they do release a single, they charge like four dollars for it, put the instrumental version, (ooh, thanks) and expect us to buy it. A full CD with about sixteen tracks costs sixteen dollars, so that is a dollar a track. Buying a single means I am paying the equivalent of four tracks and only getting one. Now, who is ripping who off? Now, I'd much rather download it for free until the record execs decide to charge fairer prices.

Related Topics

• We The People: FTC and Coalition of States, Puerto Rico, and the Northern Mariana Islands File Anti-Trust Charges Against America's Top Record Companies.

Return to YBFREE.com's Main Page